Search for: "GRIFFIN"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin’s Case and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts; Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin’s Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Griffin's Case and Original Meaning The strongest defender of Griffin's Case was Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Over the course of his arguments, Mitchell repeatedly referred to Griffin’s Case, a federal circuit case from 1869 that concerned the “insurrection clause. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election BallotPart Two: The Three Possible, but Less-than-Ideal, Dispositions of the CasePart Three: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t AddressBruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do [UPDATED to respond to Bruce's follow-up post]Part Four: Trump’s Argument That… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
The Court will likely reverse the Colorado Supreme Court based on Griffin's Case, the absence of congressional legislation enforcing Section 3, and the prudential and pragmatic arguments made in Section 3 of the Brief signed by Attorneys General Edwin Meese III, Michael B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
“Griffin’s Case is also relevant to trying to figure out what the original public meaning of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is,” he says. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Griffin, involved a defendant’s challenge to a criminal conviction based on the fact that the judge in the case had fought for the Confederacy. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:14 pm
He cited Griffin’s Case, an 1869 decision by Chief Justice Salmon Chase, serving on a lower court. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Griffin's Case has settled the meaning of Section 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
in the Couy Griffin case currently pending.) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You will likely hear references to Griffin’s Case in the arguments. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Trump relies on a very old circuit court case, In re Griffin (1869), in which Chief Justice Samuel Chase ruled that Section 3 was inoperative until Congress passed enabling legislation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
[Note: This is the fifth in a series of essays responding to objections that have been made to enforcing Section Three of the Constitution. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 1:02 pm
Enlarge (credit: Axelle/Bauer-Griffin / Contributor | FilmMagic) 4chan users who have made a game out of exploiting popular AI image generators appear to be at least partly responsible for the flood of fake images sexualizing Taylor Swift that went viral last month. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
“The state courts should have regarded congressional enforcement legislation as the exclusive means for enforcing Section 3, as Chief Justice Chase held in In re Griffin,” a circuit decision from 1869. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:37 am
The post Everything you need to know about presentence investigations in Georgia appeared first on Griffin Durham Tanner Clarkson. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
And even Chief Justice Chase, in Griffin's Case, who did quite wrongly suggest that only Congress could enforce Section Three, never suggested that the enforcement must take the form of criminal prosecutions and criminal trials. [read post]
