Search for: "Gaines v. Hale"
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
See Hale v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Toulson, with Lord Reed giving a secondary judgment and Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Wilson agreeing with the findings of both. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
Baroness Hale made clear that “[w]hile we have been informed of its existence, we have not heard argument on whether or not that scheme is compatible with the Convention rights as the question does not arise on these appeals”. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Davies and another) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (on the application of Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 6 – 7 July 2011. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
On Thursday 28 July 2011, Lord Phillips, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case Ministry of Defence v AB and others. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm
U.S. (09-1298) and Boeing v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:07 am
First – the case of Hale v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
Dean v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
As Baroness Hale said in Stack (at [69]), in law "context is everything". [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
As Baroness Hale said in Stack (at [69]), in law "context is everything". [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Aynes, “Bradwell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO Rulings The IPSO Committee released seven rulings this week: 06319-19 Docherty v Evening Times, no breach after investigation. 09224-19 Laws v Daily Star, no breach after investigation. 05601-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi family v Mail Online. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
He had been a partner at the Washington, D.C. law firm of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr which he joined in 1978. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:26 am
Homer v West Yorkshire Police is about indirect age discrimination. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
The court also rejected the notion that gaining access to Mr. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
The Court relied on the doctrine of res judicata and in particular the CA decision in Unilin v Berry [2007] EWCA Civ 364. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am
Handing down its judgment on 30 October 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lady Hale stating that this was a case “bristling with simplicity”. [read post]
