Search for: "Gaines v. Jordan" Results 21 - 40 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2022, 1:45 pm by Ellena Erskine
Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said the committee should instead be investigating the leak of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 10:31 am by Anushka Limaye
Syria reopened a key border crossing with Jordan on Monday as a sign of President Assad’s gains in re-establishing control over the country. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
  Prominent among the docketed cases is Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:51 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
•    And finally, The Houston Chronicle reports that jury selection begins in the civil trial in Jamie Leigh Jones v. [read post]
 For further explanation, do not hesitate to contact Michael Jordan for no cost legal advice. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:59 am
" The court also cited the Supreme Court's holding in Eisner v. [read post]
  The Supreme Court of Canada Addresses Chronic Pain In Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
On September 30, 2020, the Ontario Court of Appeal (“ONCA”) held in R v Nguyen, 2020 ONCA 609 [Nguyen] that the 18-month presumptive ceiling established in R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27 [Jordan] , which governs what constitutes unreasonable delay under s. 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [Charter], applies to proceedings under Part 1 of the Provincial Offences Act, … BC Provincial Court eNewsWhat you need to know about the new… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Bloomberg BNA, Jordan Rubin previews Lozman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
Alta Energy Luxembourg S.A.R.L., 2020 FCA 43 (39113) Interpretation of tax treaty re capital gains and GAAR. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:15 am by Bridget Crawford
Chused Lynda Dodd Jill Hasday Gwen Hoerr Jordan Maya Manian Melissa Murray Mae C. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
In December last year, Jordan secured a partial victory: the People’s Supreme Court in China ruled that 乔丹 was primarily associated with Jordan the person, not the company, and cancelled these marks. [read post]