Search for: "Gaines v. Social Security Administration"
Results 361 - 380
of 503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
While the economy always dominates elections, this year’s contest is also being described as a referendum on President Obama’s administration. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
” So, how is it possible for the Supreme Court to hold that Article 3(1) of the CRC gives rise to a right to social security benefit, but Article 3(2) does not permit a legislative measure to promote children’s well-being? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
., the cloud);[28] the Snowden disclosures and resulting suspicion of U.S. surveillance practices in Europe;[29] the U.S. government’s reaction to those disclosures;[30] the increased use of encryption;[31] the rise of ISIL and recent attacks including those involving Charlie Hebdo and the French high-speed train;[32] increased surveillance authorized by new foreign laws;[33] and perhaps other aggressive counter-terrorism activities by European governments that may be at least indirectly… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm
Furthermore, certain data practices would be prohibited, including, among other things, the collection, processing, or transferring of social security numbers or nonconsensual intimate images, subject to exceptions. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
First Party v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am
Varela and Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am
Varela and Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
By Source, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm
Delhi Administration AIR 1963 SC 1572; Indian Bank Vs. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:29 pm
The Court concluded that decisions involving national security did not have to be explained with the same detail as decisions in ordinary administrative or civil cases. [read post]
