Search for: "Gaines v. Washington" Results 41 - 60 of 1,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Joe Kristan
Cite: Order on Summary Judgement, 7/9/12: Bennett Dorrance et ux. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:56 am by David S. Jones
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C.,   has rejected U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
v=M3JtBUgiji4Third-year Washington University School of Law student Joe Franklin discusses his interests in IP law and his experiences in the D.C. clinical education program. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht
Therefore, a retailer using video surveillance with facial recognition capabilities to identify shoplifters would have different obligations for gaining consent for the capture in Illinois than in Washington. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am by Freddie Whittle
Those opposed to affirmative action argue that “UT has never been clear about precisely why it needs to use racial preferences” (Bert Rein, a Washington DC lawyer representing Fisher). [read post]
Perhaps more importantly, during his time in the Public Integrity Section, Smith gained substantial experience investigating and prosecuting both high-ranking former officials and crimes relating to the mishandling of classified informa [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
  Aaron Blake reports for The Washington Post. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Among the many provision in the Act is language to overrule the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp v. [read post]