Search for: "Gall v. Steele"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
Defences – justification (truth) There is not much to report in relation to this defence: the burden of proof is – and is likely to remain – on the defendant, despite calls from some campaigners for it to shift (The ECtHR has held that requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
It’s especially galling that the court cloaked an attack on integration in the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment and the Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Brian Galle, SALT in Their Wounds? [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Brian Galle, SALT in Their Wounds? [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
A bicycle equipped with only handbrakes shall be tested for stopping distance by a rider of at least 68.1 kg (150 lb) weight in accordance with the performance test, § 1512.18(d)(2) (v) and (vi), and shall have a stopping distance of no greater than 4.57 m (15 ft) from the actual test speed as determined by the equivalent ground speed specified in § 1512.18(d)(2)(vi).(2) Hand lever access. [read post]
