Search for: "Gallagher v. Attorney General" Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2019, 5:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
By Gantman, P.J.E.), involved both the Sackett stacking issue as well as the issue of the retroactive effect of the Pennsylvania’s eradication of the household exclusion in the Gallagher v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Gallagher Blogs – Mary Whisner: Overruling Risk – Wrongful Discharge Example: “The tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy is an exception to the general rule that at-will employees can quit or be fired for any reason. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
”  The judge in Conti also pointed out that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Gallagher “offer[ed] no opinion or comment on the enforceability of any other exclusion to UM or UIM coverage or to coverage in general,” citing Gallagher v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:46 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
It was noted that, months before this issue came before this court, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had generally eradicated the household exclusion’s application under Pennsylvania law under similar circumstances at issue in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
By Gantman, P.J.E.), which involved important unsettled issues, including both the Sackett stacking issue as well as the issue of the retroactive effect of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's eradication of the household exclusion in the Gallagher v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gallagher 2011 NY Slip Op 32563(U); September 20, 2011; Supreme Court, Nassau County; Docket Number: 323/11; Judge: Karen V. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
Judges Tozzi, Sims, and Gallagher sat on the “hot” ACCA panel hearing oral argument in the historic case of US. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
  First, the court in Rush referred to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s household exclusion decision in Gallagher v. [read post]