Search for: "Gallo v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Calk had hoped then-President Trump would name him to a powerful government post, including treasury secretary, defense secretary, or ambassador to France or the United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
United States of America et al Se ha definido las peleas de gallo como un “deporte” donde se crían gallos de pelea y se entrenan para combate a muerte entre dos de ellos. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
Cir. 2005)).Preliminarily, the Board found that the doctrine of foreign equivalents may apply, since “more than 1.3 million people in the United States speak French at home. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to grant a conventional antisuit injunction, even though there would actually be valid policy reasons to do so.On two other occasions, this blog accurately predicted antisuit injunctions barring patent holders from the overseas enforcement of SEP injunctions: Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:44 am
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to reconsider his decision to bar Huawei from enforcing a couple of Chinese patent injunctions prior to a San Francisco trial. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to revisit his decision, and it filed a Ninth Circuit appeal with the Federal Circuit. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
In: Gallo D., Paladini L., Pustorino P. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:32 pm
In Oracle v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:00 am
Gallo Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:00 am
Gallo Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
