Search for: "Galvin v Galvin"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 3:51 am
Galvin, 37 How. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:47 am
See People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Remember Frank Galvin? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:40 am
Massachusetts charges Bulldog Investors, Investment News, January 31, 2007 Secretary Galvin Charges Phillip Goldstein and Bulldog Investors for unregistered securities offering, Securities Division, January 31, 2007 Related Web Resource: Goldstein v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Galvin. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Galvin, which addressed whether the Voting Rights Act applies to state felon disenfranchisement laws. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:38 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
Galvin, in which the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am
., v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
Bank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:21 pm
., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
v=YBD6FxrtJN0 [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:52 am
Hoffman is accused of fraudulently selling $3.3M of unregistered securities, along with childhood friend Thomas V. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
Galvin (09-920): originally conference of 4.23.10 De la Rosa v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
In view of this failure, and in the absence of a court order discharging defendants as the attorneys of record in the foreclosure action, defendants continued to represent plaintiffs in that action and their authority as the attorneys of record continued unabated (see GMAC Mtge., LLC v Galvin, 184 AD3d 750, 750-751 [2d Dept 2020]; Hess v Tyszko, 46 AD2d 980, 980 [3d Dept 1974]). [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
The appellate panel also rejected arguments that amended Regulation A should be vacated as arbitrary and capricious because the SEC failed to explain adequately how the rule protects investors (Lindeen v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
Galvin, Reminger Co., L.P.A. [read post]
