Search for: "Ganesh Sitaraman" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2018, 6:22 am by Mark Graber
   Part III examines the influence on constitutional democracy of such global forces as climate change (Robert Percival), religious fundamentalism (Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar), terrorism (Oren Gross), economic inequality (Ganesh Sitaraman), globalization (David Schneiderman), immigration (T. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 1:24 pm by Elena Chachko
Without making any direct comparisons, this approach is reminiscent of what Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth recently described as a process of “normalization” of U.S. foreign relations law, whereby the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am by William Ford
Timothy Meyer and Ganesh Sitaraman argued that the president can begin a trade war without the consent of Congress because free trade advocates built the system that way. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Ganesh Sitaraman examined the national security consequences of deregulation. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:22 am by Garrett Hinck
Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth argued that “national security deference” should not influence federal courts to concede to the government in litigation over the travel ban. [read post]
30 May 2015, 6:54 am by Tara Hofbauer
Ganesh Sitaraman and David Zionts introduced the role that behavioral psychology plays in decisions about war. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 1:58 pm by Ilya Somin
Sitaraman and Wuerth are absolutely right about national security exceptionalism. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
In a recent article for the Administrative Law Review, Ganesh Sitaraman of Vanderbilt Law School and Ariel Dobkin of WilmerHale argued that single-director agencies enjoy distinct advantages over multi-member commissions, including improved efficiency and clearer lines of accountability. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:30 am by margaret
Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman have outlined this proposal in a forthcoming Yale Law Journal piece. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
In an article for the Michigan Law Review, Timothy Meyer of Duke Law School and Ganesh Sitaraman of Vanderbilt Law School argue that the major questions doctrine will undermine the President’s ability to levy economic sanctions when exercising foreign affairs powers. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am by Curtis Bradley
Although somewhat less clear, the decision also tends to undercut the claim (made most notably by Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth in a recent article in the Harvard Law Review) that the Supreme Court is “normalizing” foreign relations law – that is, treating it the same way that it treats ordinary issues of domestic law. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:08 am by Peter Margulies
War would be easier if an enemy agreed to stand still. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Todd N. Tucker
As Tim Meyer and Ganesh Sitaraman wrote on Lawfare, the scope of the president’s authority in these matters is broad. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm by Guest Blogger
Amy KapczynskiIn April, Jack Balkin, Yochai Benkler and I convened a workshop on the law and political economy of technology at Yale Law School. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:01 pm by Jordan Brunner
The New York Times reports that the deadliest chemical weapons attack in years in Syria killed dozens of people in the northern province of Idlib this morning. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am by Sebastian Brady
Ingrid Weurth and Ganesh Sitaraman pointed us to their new article in the Harvard Law Review, “The Normalization of Foreign Relations Law. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Sara Savat
” Last year, Epps and Vanderbilt’s Ganesh Sitaraman wrote a paper “How to Save the Supreme Court,” recommending structural changes for SCOTUS. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:23 am by Sebastian Brady
Ganesh Sitaraman and David Zionts pointed us to their new NYU Law Review article on the lessons that behavioral psychology has for constitutional debates on war powers. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 7:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
And while we’re discussing limitations on presidential war powers, Ganesh Sitaraman linked to a new essay where he questions the viability of “credibility” arguments as a basis for presidential military action. [read post]