Search for: "Garcia v. City of Chicago" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” by Emily Opilo and Alex Mann for Baltimore Sun Ethics National: “Palin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, in a ruling last month by a district court in the City of Chicago’s challenge to Attorney General Sessions’ insistence that Chicago comply with § 1367, the court conceived of the inquiry into § 1373’s constitutionality as follows: [The AG’s insistence on] compliance [with § 1373] must be proper under the Spending Clause, and 1373 must pass constitutional muster [under the Printz analysis.] [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSubpar Representation of Murder Defendant Triggers Habeas Corpus Relief Garcia v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by MBettman
Using information gathered from the GPS, Hackney tracked the van to a shopping center parking lot in Calumet City, Illinois. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
Schwinn, an associate professor of law at the John Marshall Law School in Chicago and co-editor of the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am by Rory Little
City of Chicago as well as the court’s decision last term in Timbs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts, still haunted by the ghost of Lochner, may be trending towards Garcia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
  Utah Federal Court Halts Aereo in Salt Lake City Variety. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Sorich, No. 06-4251 Convictions and sentences for mail fraud and making materially false statements to federal investigators in relation to patronage appointments in the City of Chicago's civil service are affirmed over defendants' arguments that: 1) their actions did not constitute mail fraud; 2) the honest services mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. section 1346, is unconstitutionally vague; 3) they did not deprive the city or the people of Chicago of any… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am by David Oscar Markus
Supreme Court.Lozman, a 50-year-old former Chicago financial trader, seeminglylost his nearly six-year battle with the seaside city of Riviera Beachwhen his home was hauled away in 2009 and later destroyed by courtorder. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]