Search for: "Garcia v. Community Legal Serv. Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am by PaulKostro
DEMELLIER, JR., a/k/a BUD DEMELLIER; RAUL GARCIA, a/k/a RUDY GARCIA; NICOLE HARRISONG-ARCIA, Defendants-Respondents, and NEIGHBORHOOD RESEARCH CORP., d/b/a MOUNTAINTOP MEDIA; RICHARD K. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
In 1981, Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals successfully argued Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Justice was served in the sense that the dismissal was ultimately grounded on the legally correct principles, but 8 extra years of litigation is hardly justice being served. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Volunteer status of nonprofit members serving as credentialing examination graders. 6. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Investing to advance a societal goal constitutes a mixed motive, a fiduciary violation.[2] The attorneys general of a number of states have drafted legal opinions prohibiting their public entities from ESG investing on this basis.[3] These opinions rely on an assumption that ESG investing is non-pecuniary and therefore entails a mixed motive. [read post]
Similar tendencies are at play in another immigration appeal, Garcia-Carbajal v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Accordingly, where the employment calls for minimal contact between the employee and others, there may be no reason to conduct an investigation beyond obtaining prior employment information and personal interview data);Garcia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 2014 began with the news from Canada that Quebec artist Claude Robinson’s lengthy battle with Cinar Corp. over copyright infringement had ended  with a partial victory in Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Second, the department’s analysis of the spineflower mitigation measures was legally impermissible because there was no substantial evidence that the mitigation matters were adequate. [read post]