Search for: "Garcia v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 1,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 8 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Garcia v Marex Financial Ltd. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Garcia, which asks whether federal law pre-empts a state prosecution for identity theft for using someone else’s Social Security number. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Garcia, 17-834 (rescheduled three times and relisted three times). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:38 am by Tim Zubizarreta
Garcia and the other defendants were charged with identity theft by Kansas but argue that the IRCA prevents the state from using overlapping information in their prosecution. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:37 am by Scott Bomboy
Garcia, the Court will consider if a federal law, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (or IRCA), disallows states from using information taken from a federal work eligibility form to prosecute illegal immigrants suspected of identity fraud. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am by Scott Sternberg
By: Amber Barlow Garcia, Deutsch KerriganWhen a lawsuit is filed in state court but federal court is a proper forum, defendants often prefer to remove the case. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
Garcia, 17-834 Issues: (1) Whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act expressly pre-empts the states from using any information entered on or appended to a federal Form I-9, including common information such as name, date of birth, and social security number, in a prosecution of any person (citizen or alien) when that same, commonly used information also appears in non-IRCA documents, such as state tax forms, leases, and credit applications; and (2) if IRCA bars the… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, contrary to the defendants’ contention, the complaint sufficiently pleaded a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d at 830; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1007, 1009). [read post]