Search for: "Garcia v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 1,547
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Paoletti
In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Stanford Law School Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, and the law firm Sidley Austin challenged the practice of prolonged detention in two class action cases—Garcia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:13 pm by David Garcia and Nadezhda Nikonova
 David Garcia and Nadezhda Nikonova discuss the AmEx case, explain the economic rationale behind the rule, and analyze its possible applicability to healthcare antitrust cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:13 pm by David Garcia and Nadezhda Nikonova
 David Garcia and Nadezhda Nikonova discuss the AmEx case, explain the economic rationale behind the rule, and analyze its possible applicability to healthcare antitrust cases. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia argues that “Kavanaugh’s 2014 dissenting opinion in SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 9:04 am by Eric Goldman
* Remember the Innocence of Muslims video (& its contribution to the important Garcia v Google precedent)? [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At The Conversation, Ruben Garcia points to his own research in Nevada to argue that Wednesday’s decision in  Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-9187, and Villareal-Garcia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Bybee dissented in part and would have affirmed summary judgment against the discriminatory termination claim as well (Garcia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am by Jorrit Rijpma
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Ruben Garcia argues that in “Epic Systems … and … Encino Motor Cars v. [read post]