Search for: "Garcia v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:14 pm
Brad Garcia clerked on the D.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 10:06 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
USA, et al. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At the ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia assesses Monday’s argument in Epic Systems v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAntitrust
Eye Surgery Equipment Maker's Tying Claim Survives; Predatory Pricing Claim Dismissed
Synergetics USA Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
In their August 6, 2009 Chicago superseding indictment filed in USA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 540 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2008); Flagler v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
” * BWP Media USA v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that in Kansas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
