Search for: "Garcia-Garcia v. Sessions"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:45 am
Sessions v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am
(Might be more interesting to go back to Garcia’s photo in this account.) [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Herrera-Garcia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This post deals with a more mainstream IP topic, patent validity, which was the subject of the "Validity is king" breakout session. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
Kristelia Garcia: the bullets you give apply to the plaintiff’s side. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:40 am
Thanks to a ruling this month by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Garcia v Garcia, we can now welcome a third category of expulsion case, which we’ll dub cases involving a “naked” expulsion clause. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Sony v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 17-5283, Garcia-Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
Sessions v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:50 am
Yesterday, the first day of the October 2017 term, the justices heard oral argument in Sessions v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
This morning the justices wrap up the February session with an oral argument in one of the marquee cases of the term, June Medical Services v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
See Mota v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
Sessions v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
By Little V. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 4: Lewis v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:19 pm
She had about 86 sessions with A.E.. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
(The trial that began last week of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, an undocumented man accused of murdering San Francisco woman and American citizen Kate Stienle two years ago, is directing a lot of publicity to the administration’s stance here.) [read post]
