Search for: "Gardner v. Harris"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Graham (University of Manchester), R (Gardner and Harris) V Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Others [2022] Ewhc 967: Scant Regard for Covid-19 Risk to Care Homes, 30 Medical L.... [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Kalven categorized NAACP v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Kalven categorized NAACP v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:59 am
Eriq Gardner On the legal docket: 'Glee' compensation, the originality of 'Modern Family' and 'Harry Potter,' Shirley Sherrod v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 am
Today's advance release probate law opinion: In re Probate Appeal of Harris (Probate appeal; appeal to trial court from decree of Probate Court admitting decedent's will to probate; claim that trial court erred in concluding that decedent's will was validly attested by two witnesses as required by statute (§ 45a-251); whether Supreme Court's decision in Gardner v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
And here's a link to my post when the CCA granted review.AP-75,582, John Steven Gardner v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm
Today, Terry Lenamon continues his analysis on the case of Ronnie Lee Gardner, who may be executed by firing squad on Friday. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Lord Irvine clearly disagreed flatly will all of this “prevailing orthodoxy”, pointing out the enervating effect of this reasoning in Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal) [2011] UKSC 43, in which Lord Hope seemed afraid (paragraphs 67-72) to go further than Strasbourg has gone as he put it more than once. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:26 am
Harris Using Links as Citations Helps Gizmodo Defeat a Defamation Claim–Redmond v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
But other than our somewhat recently retired Judge Bob Harris, I can’t remember another who did. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
But other than our somewhat recently retired Judge Bob Harris, I can’t remember another who did. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:11 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Rachael Gardner v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:21 am
Justice lawyers said in the notice (PDF) in Keepseagle v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:14 pm
"Lamebook v. [read post]
