Search for: "Gardner v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:36 am
Insulation, Inc. v Gardner, 2013 NY Slip Op 01017, Court of Appeals The Bath Volunteer Fire Department [BVFD], a not-for-profit fire corporation under Not-for-Profit Corporation Law §1402, historically operated from a building owned by the Village of Bath. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:53 pm by The Recorder
“Even if these provisions of Senate Bill 1137 could be deemed to further Proposition 36's public health purpose, they would still be unconstitutional because they are inconsistent with the proposition's other primary purposes of saving jail cells for violent offenders and saving money with use of treatment instead of incarceration,” Marchiano wrote in Gardner v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm by Orin Kerr
Gardner, 387 U.S. 158, 163, 87 S.Ct. 1520, 18 L.Ed.2d 697 (1967). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm by Eric
As Techdirt's Mike Masnick asked rhetorically, "Dear Lamar Smith & House Judiciary: Have You Learned Nothing from SOPA? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm
Defendant could not suppress seizure of his telephone records from the telephone company under Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
Thompson and Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
David; Hedrick, Charles V.; Lever Jr., Chauncey W.; Adams, Christi; Griffin, Christopher L.; Kise, Christopher M.; Creely, Curt P.; Bachrach, Daniel (Dan); Zenov, Darin I.; Cook, David C.; Woodson, R Duke; Baxa Jr., Edmund T.; Lotzia, Emerson M.; Magee, Emily; Cerezo, Francisco J.; Ridley, Fred S.; Davis, Gardner F.; Koch, Gary D.; Fernandez-Quincoces, Guillermo J.; Raij, Irwin P.; Arkin, J. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am by Adam Wagner
In a neat parallel, the former lead singer of The Smiths has recently said he is “uneasy” about the Prime Minister being a fan of the band. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
According to consumer bankruptcy attorney and nationally known foreclosure defense guru, Max Gardner… “This case may well be the final dagger in the deep dark heart of the MERS business model. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Charon QC
RollonFriday reports… Exclusive: Herbert Smith to pay lawyers £10 an hour Herbert Smith’s new Belfast outpost is rumoured to be paying its lawyers as little as £10 per hour. [read post]