Search for: "Gardner v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
The case, Pearson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:02 am
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:02 am
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or… [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
Lawcast 141: The House of Lords judgment on control orders Today I am talking to Carl Gardner, ex government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog about the House of Lords judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action Lord [...] [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:43 am
In Rideout v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:34 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:45 am
*** Caselaw considered CASE OF HIRST v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:07 am
In Gardner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:47 pm
Gardner v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Gardner v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:30 am
The recently concluded (and now appealed) Gardner v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 8:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
