Search for: "Garner v. Board of Public Works"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd, heard 11-12 Oct 2017. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
(Canada) v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am
However, unlike dysfunctional state legislatures in North Carolina and Illinois, Utah's actually works quite well and develops legislative compromises on even the most difficult areas of public policy. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:13 pm
The judge in Novak v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:17 am
The judge in Novak v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
Grapin has garnered a lot of public support. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Background While the decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals binds many public companies of that specific jurisdiction, the SEC must now decide whether to propose a clarifying change to Rule 14a-8(i)(8) ("the Rule"), binding all companies subject to Federal Securities Law and alleviating courts of difficult interpretation. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
The OHCHR’s program of work for this project, to which I will contribute, is available here. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
The Oklahoma Supreme Court created a narrow “public policy” exception to the employment-at-will doctrine, referred to as a Burk tort. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
O’Connor v Bar Standards Board, heard 4 Oct 2017. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Reilly has been one of Pack’s few public supporters during his time as the USAGM CEO. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
Following on from the ECJ's decision in Coleman v Attridge Law protection from discrimination by association is covered by s.13 across the board, except for the protected characteristic of marriage/civil partnership. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
Following on from the ECJ's decision in Coleman v Attridge Law protection from discrimination by association is covered by s.13 across the board, except for the protected characteristic of marriage/civil partnership. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At some level, of course, this is his fault by making it such a public priority to get the minority on board. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Public policy was not on my radar. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
She has served as a trustee on the board of St. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
Jenack Estate Appraisers and Auctioneers v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
"[6] The concept of distribution is often interrelated to publication, as "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public constitutes a ‘publication' of such work. [read post]
