Search for: "Garner v. Board of Public Works" Results 81 - 100 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 4:39 am by CMS
  One of his judgments which garnered media attention and criticism from the (then) Home Secretary – Michael Howard-  was the case of R v Home Secretary ex p Norney [1995] QBD 6 Oct. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 But if the 2011 SEC CF Guidance was a wake-up call for public companies, the 2018 SEC Guidance was a resounding fire alarm — and is a must-read for any C-suite executive at a public company. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
United States has also garnered media interest. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 (Capital One’s June 9, 2020, motion to set aside Judge Anderson’s order can be found here, which is opposed by the plaintiffs in a June 12, 2020 response found here,  which of course, garnered a June 16, 2020, reply from Capital One found here — — but we will get to that later.) [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
Board of Education wherein the Supreme Court held that separate but equal facilities in public accommodations unconstitutional in 1954. [read post]
  The five most popular proposal topics in 2022, representing 49% of all shareholder proposal submissions, were (i) climate change, (ii) special meetings, (iii) anti-discrimination and diversity, (iv) independent chair, and (v) lobbying spending and political contributions (which tied for fifth most common proposal topic). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am by Rachel Margolis
Strategy to Address the Root Causes of Migration had garnered more than $3.2 billion in investment commitments from companies like Gap, Visa, Microsoft, Cargill, and others. [read post]
Horrifying images of George Floyd dying on a Minneapolis street while a police officer knelt on his neck have sparked peaceful protests and rioting throughout the country. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
This Section, which is set out below, has been in the Copyright Act since 2012, when the Copyright Modernization Act was proclaimed into force and is a condition which hosting providers must comply with in order to obtain the benefit of the hosting safe harbour in Subsection 31.1(4): (5) Subsection (4) does not apply in respect of a work or other subject-matter if the person providing the digital memory knows of a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction to the effect that the person… [read post]