Search for: "Garner v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Certainly, asking our judges to be respectful to litigants using other general neutral means (such as addressing a party as "Attorney Smith" or "Plaintiff Smith") does not force anyone to violate their beliefs. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:00 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Counterman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Smith-Green * Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Smith involved a claim by members of a minority religion--the Native American Church--and so garnered the liberals' sympathy for minority rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm by Angie Gou
For instance, in a school-speech case that garnered massive public attention, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:33 pm by Josh Blackman
We know she has a preference for stare decisis, at least with respect to Smith. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm by Shea Denning
Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) (officer acted reasonably in ramming his bumper into suspect’s vehicle to terminate high-speed chase that lasted for six minutes over ten miles and during which the suspect’s car hit a police car); Smith v. [read post]