Search for: "Garner v. State of Tennessee" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 3:36 pm by Chuck Peterson
At common-law (the law that followed our forefathers from England), and the law in most of the states until Tennessee v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:36 pm by Chuck Peterson
At common-law (the law that followed our forefathers from England), and the law in most of the states until Tennessee v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
While CVS Health’s acquisition of Aetna kept the company–which had planned a relocation to New York City–in Hartford,[6] there was no such reprieve with General Electric or Alexion Pharmaceuticals, both of which decamped to Boston.[7] Corporations headquartered elsewhere, like Caterpillar, Motorola, and Kraft Heinz, reduced the size of their Connecticut workforces—and that’s just the companies that shifted jobs to one city, Chicago.[8] The biggest companies… [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Despite the criticism from Democrats, Barrett garnered bipartisan support at her 2017 confirmation hearing. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm by David Kopel
Thus, the need to train officers in the constitutional limitations on the use of deadly force, see Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  If killing the dogs here was reasonable, it would therefore follow that police may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures (which, under Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am by John Ehrett
Garner allows a police officer to use deadly force to prevent the suspect‘s escape if based on the totality of the circumstances, the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others and where when feasible some warning has been given; (2) whether Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Garner allows a police officer to use deadly force to prevent the suspect's escape if based on the totality of the circumstances, the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others, and where feasible some warning has been given; (2) whether Tennessee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by SHG
Amnesty’s report also charges that the laws on lethal force in 13 states do not even meet the less stringent constitutional standard set by the 1985 US supreme court case Tennessee v Garner. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
”  And yet as White points out in his post, the Supreme Court in Tennessee v. [read post]