Search for: "Garner v. State of Tennessee" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by SHG
Amnesty’s report also charges that the laws on lethal force in 13 states do not even meet the less stringent constitutional standard set by the 1985 US supreme court case Tennessee v Garner. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
The case has the potential for clarifying how a major Supreme Court precedent in 1985 on the use of "deadly force" by police in stopping fleeing suspects, Tennessee v. [read post]
Seven states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Oregon and Tennessee) permit additional third parties, outside of immediate family members or caregivers, to assist with ballot collection. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Garner allows a police officer to use deadly force to prevent the suspect's escape if based on the totality of the circumstances, the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others, and where feasible some warning has been given; (2) whether Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:36 am by SHG
In any event, these factors change how we look at this individual shooting, at least by a lawyer with a police background.[2] Under the guidelines in Tennessee v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:36 pm by Chuck Peterson
At common-law (the law that followed our forefathers from England), and the law in most of the states until Tennessee v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:36 pm by Chuck Peterson
At common-law (the law that followed our forefathers from England), and the law in most of the states until Tennessee v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:36 pm by Chuck Peterson
At common-law (the law that followed our forefathers from England), and the law in most of the states until Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  If killing the dogs here was reasonable, it would therefore follow that police may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures (which, under Tennessee v. [read post]