Search for: "Garnett v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
I am part of a group of constitutional and property law scholars who have filed an amicus brief in, Horne v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty arising from the same conduct was correctly dismissed as duplicative of the legal malpractice claim (see Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, 82 AD3d 435, 436 [1st Dept 2011]; InKine Pharm. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm by Bryan Ramos
New Injury (0) Would Kevin Garnett’s knee injury be considered a workers’ compensation claim? [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Garnett offers a link to a video discussion about the implications of last term’s decision in In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Rick Garnett
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Stuart Buck
In so doing, the state apparently realized the futility of claiming that its expansive buffer zone law was supported by Hill v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:54 pm by Paul Horwitz
 (You can find a couple of entries at National Review Online by our own Rick Garnett.) [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Morrison & Foerster LLP, 157 A.D.3d 456, 457 (1st Dep’t 2018); Garnett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am by Rick Garnett
The best-known instance and illustration of Justice Breyer's church-state intuitions is his concurring opinion in Van Orden v. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 6:43 am
Ashcroft, which was adjudicated by the United States of America Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:06 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
” This article makes a case for an international convention on expert determination (ED) and Dispute Boards (DBs) that would require its Contracting States to recognise agreements on ED/DBs and enforce ED/DB decisions. [read post]