Search for: "Garrett v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps surveys the eight immigration cases awaiting decision at the court, observing that “history may record this term as a blockbuster in one area that has become eerily relevant to America in 2017: how much due process is owed to immigrants, undocumented aliens, aliens outside the United States—and even naturalized citizens. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
’” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that “the cases of two Arkansas inmates, Don William Davis and Bruce Earl Ward, sentenced to death by courts in that state” have raised the stakes in McWilliams v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am
United States, holding that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
The scenario above roughly describes the constitutional regulation of police use of force in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
As the new year arrives, RegBlog would like to reflect on the many important regulatory developments and debates that occurred in the United States and around the world in 2016. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague and whether a ruling to that effect would be retroactive. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
United States; she highlights two cases before the court this term, Lynch v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
