Search for: "Garrison v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 6:08 am
Today [October 5, 2015], the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the petition for a writ of certiorari (the “Petition”) filed by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:27 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Alternatively, she argued that she was entitled to rely directly on the directive, as the respondent was an emanation of the State. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:27 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Search of home Appellant, Shakieem Garrison, was indicted and charged with possession with intent to distribute cocaine and related offenses. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Given that the Court has resolved long ago that recklessness is sufficient for First Amendment purposes, even in criminal cases (Garrison v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 6:50 pm by Carl Neff
 Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Sullivan (1964) (rejecting the view that libel is categorically unprotected, and holding that the libel exception requires a showing that the libelous accusations be “of and concerning” a particular person); Garrison v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 3:26 am
Most oddly, the Prosecutor did not distinguish or discuss Uganda v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
"Now, I'm not a monster Garrison Keillor fan, and know a personal detail or two about the guy from a firsthand source that aren't too flattering, but I nonetheless thought the reference meaningful as well as enlightening.Here's the second:"There’s an old saying:  Crime doesn’t pay, but at least you’re your own boss. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:58 pm
Criminal libel has long since been abandoned (see Garrison v Louisiana, 379 US 64, 69 [1964]), not least of all because of its tendency in practice to penalize and chill speech that the constitution protects, and it has been decades since New York’s criminal libel statute was repealed. [read post]