Search for: "Gas Service Company v. Morris" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2023, 3:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; 2978 Gas Corp. v United Fleet, Inc., 197 AD3d at 1140). [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 26 March, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Super Industrial Services Ltd & Anor v National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
If a contract is so voided, "the insured is not liable for the payment of any past services rendered, or future services to be rendered, by the violating person under that contract or otherwise. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
If a contract is so voided, "the insured is not liable for the payment of any past services rendered, or future services to be rendered, by the violating person under that contract or otherwise. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Company v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
In a similar line, in Shelly Morris Business Services Ltd. v Syncor Solutions Limited,[8]Shelly Morris Business Services Ltd. v Syncor Solutions Limited, 2020 BCSC 2038 (“Shelly Morris”). [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, gas delivered to gas stations is already taxed at the importer or distributor level, meaning that no tax has to be administered on the gas station operator or the final consumer purchasing the gas at the pump. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Declaration of Wesley Morris ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction (“Morris Decl. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Thus the plaintiff could proceed against the non-manufacturer pioneer company, even though the plaintiff's claims against the actual manufacturers were properly dismissed on warning causation grounds. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Schapiro announced two changes to the enforcement process at the SEC intended to “empower” the staff of the Enforcement Division. [1] First, Chairman Schapiro ended a two-year “pilot” program, implemented by the prior Chairman, which required the Enforcement staff to seek prior approval of the Commission before negotiating a civil money penalty against a public company for alleged securities fraud. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
Morris, 975 S.W.2d 308 (Tenn. 1998) (Plaintiff permitted to add defendant’s employer as a party defendant). [read post]