Search for: "Gates v. Municipal Court (1992)"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
EXEMPTIONS Golden Gate Land Holding, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Schmidlin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]