Search for: "Gatt v. Gatt"
Results 61 - 80
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:46 am
Armin von Bogdandy (Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht) & Ingo Venzke (Univ. of Amsterdam - Law) have published International Judicial Lawmaking: On Public Authority and Democratic Legitimation in Global Governance (Springer 2012). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 11:07 am
In Brown v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:28 am
If the decision in Sonos, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:13 am
• Regulation 1383/2003 imposes unnecessary restrictions and provokes unnecessary delays that impede the freedom of transit enshrined in GATT Article V. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Over the last three years we have followed Canada’s ongoing battle to protect and reserve it supply management system for dairy and poultry products in place and negotiated for since the original GATT negotiations concluded in 1947. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:03 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The PTS decision violates the GATT 1994 and is not justified under the national security exception of Article XXI of the GATT 1994. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:08 am
China can, however, raise a defense for the protection of the public morals under GATT Art. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
Such is the case of Golan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:49 am
For example, this mutually supportive approach could be investigated from a number of angles: 1) how, when, and to what extent can future IIA practice – as informed by existing treaty practice and jurisprudence – integrate environmental sustainability and protection components (ie GATT-like general exceptions, sustainable development obligations) while still protecting legitimate foreign investments; 2) how, when, and to what extent could environmental agreements (especially… [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:56 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:40 am
V)? [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm
The “jobs v. trade” dichotomy is well known. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
But there is an intriguing WTO, product v. process, angle to it. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:09 am
uri=OJ:L:2013:223:0001:0007:EN:PDF - Claims And here are the WTO obligations under which the Faroe Islands brought legal claim: (a) Article I:1 of the GATT 1994, because ... the European Union fails to accord immediately and unconditionally to like products originating in the Faroe Islands relevant advantages, favours, privileges or immunities that are granted by the European Union to Atlanto Scandian herring and Northeast Atlantic mackerel products originating in other countries; … [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 9:55 am
Remember, however, that in another Chapter 11 case, Metalclad v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 2:58 pm
Indeed, the trade dispute that caused the Star Wars could have been resolved under GATT Article V, which stipulates that “there shall be freedom of transit (…), via the routes most convenient for international transit (…). [read post]
