Search for: "Gatt v. Gatt"
Results 81 - 100
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am
[v] Here, we do not seek to describe the precise modalities of the IAAA,[vi] or explore its potential political effects. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
However, it is modeled after similar provisions in the WTO agreements, including Article XXIII:1(b) of the GATT 1994, under which panels have concluded that complaining Members must establish identical elements.196. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
However, it is modeled after similar provisions in the WTO agreements, including Article XXIII:1(b) of the GATT 1994, under which panels have concluded that complaining Members must establish identical elements.196. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:32 am
For example, Maria V. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm
Since the Continental Casualty v Argentina arbitral tribunal directly referred to the jurisprudence of the Appellate Body under GATT Article XX when interpreting a necessity test under a non-precluded measures clause of a BIT, there has been significant scholarly debate as to whether the concept of necessity as interpreted in WTO law is an appropriate model for international investment law. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:35 pm
Granholm v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:41 am
by Dennis Crouch Hyatt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:29 pm
Searle LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am
What does not matter, at least not at this stage of setting the scope of the TBT Agreement (and probably GATT Art. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA is a request by the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon (Greece) to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on the following question: What is the scope of ... [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
This is from USTR's 2018 Trade Policy Agenda and 2017 Annual Report (p. 28), released yesterday: v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments in Golan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
For Part I click here, for Part II click here, for Part III click here, for Part IV click here, for Part V click here, for Part VI click here. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:59 am
The EU might cite to the 2nd supplementary provision to para 1 of GATT Art. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:48 am
Steger, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law EU’s Renewable Energy Directive saved by GATT Art. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:27 am
C-384/10) Alberto Muñoz Fernández, Nuevas iniciativas contra la trata de personas: la implicación de todos los actores (el papel de los particulares) Ángeles Rodríguez Vázquez, De nuevo una sentencia del TJUE sobre un demandado cuyo domicilio se desconoce en el ámbito de aplicación del Reglamento Bruselas I José Ángel Rueda García, Entra en vigor el acuerdo para la promoción y protección… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am
For anyone wanting to know more, please refer to the full decision.By way of a primer, the case of Australia v Indonesia and others concerned WTO proceedings with regards to the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011, which set certain rules on the packaging of tobacco products. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am
For anyone wanting to know more, please refer to the full decision.By way of a primer, the case of Australia v Indonesia and others concerned WTO proceedings with regards to the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011, which set certain rules on the packaging of tobacco products. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:46 am
XXIV GATT / V GATS alone can effectively balance multilateral inclusiveness and regional exclusivity. [read post]
