Search for: "Gault v. May" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
(Note: Olson-Gault, readers may recall, had authored an affidavit asserting that ABA standards require a learned counsel at every phase of a capital case, including pretrial stages. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
Neither justice mentions In re Gault, the 1967 Arizona case the Supreme Court agreed to hear exactly one week after announcing Miranda v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:38 pm by Maria Hook
Gault J considered that the case was “very unusual” (at [68]). [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm by Maria Hook
It follows that the question of the burden of proof may become determinative. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am by MBettman
”) In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:55 am by bvertz
[1] The Court noted analogous, but not controlling, decisions in civil cases involving juvenile delinquency, In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967); involuntary hospitalization of inmates, Vitek v. [read post]