Search for: "Gee v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
  Because if you ended up getting less than that, well, gee, too bad. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Gee, a challenge to a law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital; she reports that “[i]f the law is upheld, it could make Louisiana the first state with no abortion clinic since the high court’s 1973 Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am by Josh Blackman
" Now, the article is not about United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:17 am by Gideon
Rephrased, in the words of Judge Gee, writing for the 5th Circuit in US v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (citation omitted)); Coleman v Fox Horan & Camerini, LLP, 274 AD2d 308, 309 (1st Dept 2000); see also Kodsi v Gee, 100 AD3d 437, 438 (1st Dept 2012) (citations omitted). [read post]