Search for: "General Box Co. v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
As Breyer J pointed out in his dissent: As a result of the majority’s interpretation, many of the international organizations to which the United States belongs will discover that they are now exposed to civil lawsuits based on their (U. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Bexis
  Yup, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases on our top ten list on the same day. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), … [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Patent Docs), Generic drug developers will continue to take advantage of global demand for lower-priced drugs, with Teva poised to maintain lead position says Goldman Sachs analyst: (GenericsWeb), Daiichi Sankyo takeover of Ranbaxy: (Profitability through Simplicity), (Spicy IP), (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generics to penetrate 26% pharma market in Canada says RNCOS research: (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generic drug makers spreading misinformation about patent regulation… [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Instead, according to the court, The United States Supreme Court has never held that rape-shield statutes do not represent a legitimate state interest, nor has it ever held that highly probative evidence will necessarily outweigh that interest. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision:… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]