Search for: "General Box Co. v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner)   Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office)   Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46)   South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am by Kathy Kreps
United States Steel Corp., an Indiana court found a co-worker’s Confederate flag tattoo “was not sufficiently severe and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:47 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, imposes some constitutional constraints on asset forfeiture. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:04 am
Swanger observed Katakis checking boxes on various emails and unchecking those emails that Katakis believed that Swanger needed. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
The protection order was based solely on Teel’s actions in causing public records to be published—a right that is protected under both the United States and Washington Constitutions. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Finally, Carpenter Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
In many instances, the goods were shipped directly into the United States from suppliers in other countries using international express mail. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg, Joe Nocera argues that this week’s decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]