Search for: "General Construction Co. v. Hering Realty Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Dexter Shoe Co., 42 A.D.3d 494, 840 N.Y.S.2d 610 (2nd Dept. 2007). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:32 am
In Cornell v. 360 West 51st St. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
General awareness that snow and ice may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of the particular condition that caused the plaintiff's fall (see Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp., 84 NY2d 967; Gloria v MGM Emerald Enterprs., 298 AD2d 355). [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Ballard Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
See Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Low quality construction work with little soundproofing. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
Geraci v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Brokerage - Commercial / Office 2 Cheryl Mackey self-empliyed Homebuyer 3 Peter Pellegrini NOI Commercial Real Estate Broker 3 Mary Papastratis Remax Today Brokerage - Residential 2 Robert Balducci Bronx Community Consultants Accounting for Real Estate Owners 2 mayer kohn Henry management Real estate management 3 Brian Scully PropertyShark.com Marketing 1 Prynn Kaplan PAL Realty General Contractor/Developer 1 Maria Goris CitySites … [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
As this is a motion to dismiss, the Court may look only to the amended complaint and any evidentiary material submitted to remedy defects in the amended complaint in ascertaining whether a cause of action has been stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 635-636). [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:16 pm
Madowitz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:38 pm
Her detailed and closely reasoned 132-page opinion in Ashkenazy v Gindi addresses motions to dismiss a bevy of claims and counterclaims in a battle royal between two prominent real estate investors with high-priced lawyers involving co-ownership interests in properties located in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Montreal, and other locations. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
Co. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
Co. v 263 Ninth Ave. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Low quality construction work with little soundproofing. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property “must substantially advance a legitimate state interest” to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid. [read post]
