Search for: "General Contract Corp. v. Duke"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
DUKE. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
” But the Commission also made clear that the SEC’s “broad discretion to require disclosure provides necessary latitude to expand or contract disclosure rules in light of changes in the relevant context in which securities issuers conduct their business. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court—the case is called UJ-Eighty Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
To be sure, the definitions generally share some elements in common: a smart contract involves computer code performing part or all of a transaction between parties. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
As a general matter, the federal government cannot be sued for damages without its consent. [read post]
5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2019: The Impact Of U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
Dukes and the 2013 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Dukes and the 2013 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:36 am
Here are three of them: The Kensington Publishing Case Four years ago, in a post entitled Voting Agreement Triggers Fight for Control of Family-Owned Publishing House, I wrote about Zacharius v Kensington Publishing Corp., a high-stakes fight for control of the largest independent publisher of mass-market books in the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
” Nor was the promise of compensation later, as part of a paid contract, sufficient to constitute a financial benefit, the court explained. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
The Reyeltses' contract with LSRC, like the contract signed by Joe, contained the provision quoted above. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
The Reyeltses' contract with LSRC, like the contract signed by Joe, contained the provision quoted above. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Ct. 2541 (2011), and the decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am
Indeed, it described the holding in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:39 pm
”) Finally, the opinion written by Justice Scalia for a 5 – 4 majority of the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 6:17 am
Chevron Corp ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
He said: Apart … from the question of contract …, it is said that in revenue cases there is a doctrine that the Court may ignore the legal position and regard what is called “the substance of the matter”, and that here the substance of the matter is that the annuitant was serving the Duke for something equal to his former salary or wages, and that therefore, while he is so serving, the annuity must be treated as salary or wages. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
