Search for: "General Elec. Co. v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm
Co. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
Such litigation in the dark is generally not allowed in the American court system, especially as to such central matters in a case. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
"[12] Those, at least, are the generalities. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
According to the complaint filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Sunrise of Woodland Hills admitted Barry in 2009 despite knowing it was not equipped to meet his needs as an Alzheimer's and dementia sufferer. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Westinghouse Elec. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
John, and Vernoia.On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Camden County, Docket No. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Delivery Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Elec-Tech International Co. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the contract price.[22]… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
” The “predominance” and “superiority” requirements, especially the “predominance” requirement, are key to the success or failure of many class actions and have generated significant debate in the federal courts. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:24 am
http://j.st/cts American Home Assurance Co, et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:14 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
Industrial Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
