Search for: "General Electric Co. v. Save Sales Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 6:55 am
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:47 am
Portfolio effects were hotly contested in the early 2000s, when antitrust regulators on either side of the Atlantic reached conflicting results in analyzing the proposed acquisition by General Electric Co. of Honeywell Inc.. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:13 am
Co., 839 F.3d 1034 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co, 605 N.E.2d 1032 (Ill. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:50 pm
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:35 am
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP licensing in… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
(Patent Librarian's Notebook) US Patent Reform Article: ‘Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009’ by Ed Reines and Nathan Greenblatt (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) US Patents Taxation of patent sales (IP Frontline) USPTO Office of PCT legal administration mailing list (Patent Docs) Summary of local patent rules affecting claim construction practice (Part 1 of 5) (Gray on Claims) Lawyer and neutral David… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IP finance) Can branding save Motorola’s handset business? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:41 am
We've been saving up a big batch of the juiciest tweets for those of you taking another week of summer holidays. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
In 2008, the GSA estimated its purchase of 15,000 seats of power management software would save up to $750,000 annually. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Coleman Co., Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Coleman Co., Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
