Search for: "General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm
In American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
Environmental Protection Agency, No. 20-1530, June 30, 2022, Roberts, J.).Clean Air Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
It then further found that even if the 2013 did not restate existing law, the potential environmental effects raised by UMMP through studies evaluating industrial-scale indoor growing operations—increases in electrical and water, waste plant material and odors, hazardous waste materials, increased traffic—were speculative and, thus, not reasonably foreseeable environmental effects. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
In Monsanto’s motion to dismiss, the company alleged that the District failed to prove where Monsanto was obligated to respond or monitor for PCBs under its Stormwater Permit and where the District has been injured as a result of the alleged release of PCBs into San Diego Bay. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Tuesday the federal appeals court in Washington delivered a resounding victory for science, the rule of law, and common sense by upholding the Environmental Protection Agency’s landmark actions to start curbing the dangerous carbon pollution driving climate change. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
Petitioners identified no statement from EPA that the rule would require—whether “de facto” or otherwise—that companies comply via Battery-powered Electric Vehicles (BEVs) or any other technology. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
Kovner, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general (Art Lien) As described in my preview, the case hinges on a provision of the statute, 33 U.S.C § 1369(b)(1), which specifies seven actions by the Environmental Protection Agency that are reviewable directly in the courts of appeals. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
The parties on NAM’s side of the case include agricultural companies and trade associations, electric utilities, states and environmental groups – all frequent challengers of EPA decisions. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/GZJ Wyoming v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Dean Foods Company v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The Court unanimously reaffirmed Massachusetts last year in a second case, American Electric Power v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1484Issue: (1) Whether, contrary to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. [read post]
