Search for: "General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm
In American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
Environmental Protection Agency, No. 20-1530, June 30, 2022, Roberts, J.).Clean Air Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
It then further found that even if the 2013 did not restate existing law, the potential environmental effects raised by UMMP through studies evaluating industrial-scale indoor growing operations—increases in electrical and water, waste plant material and odors, hazardous waste materials, increased traffic—were speculative and, thus, not reasonably foreseeable environmental effects. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Tuesday the federal appeals court in Washington delivered a resounding victory for science, the rule of law, and common sense by upholding the Environmental Protection Agency’s landmark actions to start curbing the dangerous carbon pollution driving climate change. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
Petitioners identified no statement from EPA that the rule would require—whether “de facto” or otherwise—that companies comply via Battery-powered Electric Vehicles (BEVs) or any other technology. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
Kovner, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general (Art Lien) As described in my preview, the case hinges on a provision of the statute, 33 U.S.C § 1369(b)(1), which specifies seven actions by the Environmental Protection Agency that are reviewable directly in the courts of appeals. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
On to the NLRB: In Troutbrook Company v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
The parties on NAM’s side of the case include agricultural companies and trade associations, electric utilities, states and environmental groups – all frequent challengers of EPA decisions. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Dean Foods Company v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The Court unanimously reaffirmed Massachusetts last year in a second case, American Electric Power v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1484Issue: (1) Whether, contrary to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have the power—absent an express authorization from Congress—to set emissions caps for power plants in a way that would drastically alter the U.S. energy system. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Import substitution subsidies are decidedly protectionist, expressly to protect jobs by restricting inputs to domestically manufactured products. [read post]
