Search for: "General Electric Company v. S&S Sales Company et al" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Scope 2 emissions are those attributable to producing the energy (principally electricity) that the company buys. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings Massachusetts’ tax advantage in New England is primarily driven by its competitive individual income tax rate and its sales and use tax structure. [read post]
We conclude that there is no legal basis to doubt the Commission’s authority to mandate public-company disclosures related to climate. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
  Management is also required to identify and disclose known trends or uncertainties likely to have a material impact on sales, revenues, or income. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
The Murray Energy Debtors together comprise the largest privately-owned coal company in the United States, producing in 2018 alone approximately 53 million tons of thermal coal used by the electric utility industry. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
While CVS Health’s acquisition of Aetna kept the company–which had planned a relocation to New York City–in Hartford,[6] there was no such reprieve with General Electric or Alexion Pharmaceuticals, both of which decamped to Boston.[7] Corporations headquartered elsewhere, like Caterpillar, Motorola, and Kraft Heinz, reduced the size of their Connecticut workforces—and that’s just the companies that shifted jobs to… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  “Direct means Direct” generally limits coverage to losses of assets that the insured held in an account for a customer or owned by the insured. [2]   In Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. [read post]