Search for: "General Motors Co" Results 21 - 40 of 2,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
     Explaining his own view of acquiescence, Taft wrote that “I don’t approve of dissents generally, for I think that in many cases, where I differ from the majority, it is more important to stand by the Court and give its judgment weight than merely record my individual dissent where it is better to have the law certain than to have it settled either way. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:01 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The future of a pedestrian and bike-friendly North County is in the hands of the next generation as their peers fall victim to motor accidents. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:17 am by Jeff Welty
If you have questions, feel free to reach out to me or to Sara DePasquale, who is a co-chair of the School’s recruiting committee. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm by Aaron Moss
Ford Motor Co., the court rejected Bette Midler’s section 3344 claim in connection with a Ford television commercial in which a Midler soundalike sang a song that Midler had made famous. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome (1972): Maritime, Generational and Judicial ClashesJames Goudkamp (University of Oxford, UK)6. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Attorney General Jonathan Kanter), consider the 1954 merger that created American Motors (AMC). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Tobin Admin
They also sought attorneys’ fees, general damages, special damages, punitive damages, and recovery for wrongful death. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Nunez identified then-Governor Andrew Cuomo’s March 16, 2020 COVID-related Executive Order as the law allegedly violated by defendants, but later amended her complaint to assert that the violation was OSH Act’s General Duty Clause. [read post]