Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. UCC"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2007, 9:19 am
General Motors Corp., No. 05-31070 (5th Cir. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:36 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 168 N.J. 236, 254 (2001) (quoting Amerada Hess Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
Ford Motor Co., No. 14–CV–6135 (JMA) (ARL), slip op. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
The general rule is that the first creditor to file the UCC-1 has first priority to the collateral when the loan goes into default. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
In general, a person who seeks express consent, when requesting consent must describe, in clear and simple general terms, the function and purpose of the computer program that is to be installed if the consent is given. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Compare Posey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
Do you guys really mean to say that, everything else being equal, economic loss claims involving UCC warranty claims would be routinely certified under PLAL? [read post]
