Search for: "General Motors Corporation v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
General Municipal Law §50-e requires that a "notice of claim" be served upon the municipality or public corporation within 90 days of the date that the claim arose as a condition precedent to commencing an action sounding in tort against a municipality or public corporation,. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
General Municipal Law §50-e requires that a "notice of claim" be served upon the municipality or public corporation within 90 days of the date that the claim arose as a condition precedent to commencing an action sounding in tort against a municipality or public corporation,. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
  Whether the Claims Sufficiently “Touch and Concern” the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Steven Cohen
Yokohama Tire Corporation et al – United States District Court – Western District of Wisconsin – February 2st, 2017) involves a vehicle accident and the subsequent lawsuit filed by the plaintiff (Below) against the defendant (Yokohama). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
General Motors Company acquired operations from General Motors Corporation on July 10, 2009 and references to prior periods in this and other press materials refer to operations of the old General Motors Corporation. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Then 1973 rolled around and all of a sudden General Motors, Ford, Chrysler and American Motors… the Big 4, if you can remember that far back… all seemed terribly out of step with what was going on in the world. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm by Gene Quinn
On Friday, July 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Yet, at a minimum, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas are open to rethinking due process along originalist lines (see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]