Search for: "General Protective Committee v. SEC" Results 141 - 160 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 10:47 am by Steven Hansen
There was a suggestion to try and start an ASTM F08.10 task or work group (similar to what we are doing in F08.96 with the ISO Technical Committee 149 SC) to suggest even more substantive changes to 16 CFR 1512 that would go well beyond the technical changes made below. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 28, 2010 decision (here), the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
New York Republican State Committee v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
[iii] The IFRS are developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), with interpretative guidance provided by the IFRS Interpretations Committee. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Charles Grassley as chief investigator, and as counsel to the Senate Finance Committee. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Historically, directors have been protected from personal liability in connection with risk management by the high standard set in the seminal 1996 Caremark[1]case. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:57 am by Cliff Palefsky
The Court violated the express terms of the FAA and preempted state law protections of general application against unconscionable and unfair arbitration agreem [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
Senate Committee on Appropriations Posted by Jay Clayton, U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am by CFM Admin
On February 6, 2018, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton offered testimony to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs about the role of the SEC and CFTC in the regulation of cryptocurrencies, ICOs and related activities. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Sec. 286.31(2): "If a blogger posts to a blog about an elected state officer ... . [read post]