Search for: "General Telephone & Electronics Corporation v. the United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 4:17 am
As FBI Director James Comey eloquently put it, “There are two kinds of big companies in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Zieminski, who had worked as a TBG senior executive for about 12 years, signed TBG’s electronic and telephone equipment policy statement and agreed in writing that TBG had the right to monitor both of his computers. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
If the agency would consider such a communication to be an undercover contact had it occurred in person or over the telephone, it should be considered an undercover contact online, subject to the same procedures and constraints. . . . [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
Outside of such recognized categories, speech is presumptively protected and generally cannot be curtailed by the government (see U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
OVDP-Generally. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the government generally “has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content” (United States v Stevens, 559 US 460, 468 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
First, certain non-content information is retained in a data warehouse in the United States for testing and quality control purposes. . . . [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Therefore, the well is a facility "from which oil or a hazardous substance was discharged""into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
As Wikipedia explains, pendent jurisdiction is theauthority of a United States federal court to hear a closely related state law claim against a party already facing a federal claim, described by the Supreme Court as `jurisdiction over nonfederal claims between parties litigating other matters properly before the court. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Fourth, our current system of intelligence oversight generally works. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
Plus, the opinion is written by a recent Attorney General of the United States, which should give it extra prominence. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
United Steelworkers (Ont. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm
: LG Electronics Inc v Sony Europe Ltd, Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc and Sony Corporation (IPKat) Bullying anti-piracy lawyers fined and suspended (TorrentFreak) Internet abuzz with claims that UK police picked up the wrong Topiary (ArsTechnica) United States US Patents iOS devs put out a call to unite against Lodsys, other patent trolls (ArsTechnica) US Patents – Decisions CAFC:… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
See generally L. [read post]
