Search for: "General v. General" Results 61 - 80 of 130,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2008, 9:10 pm
We've just been informed of a California appellate decision, Conte v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:00 pm
After being invited by the Court, the Solicitor General has filed an amicus brief in Quanta Computers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:18 pm
The case is called, Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by sally
Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 726; [2012] WLR (D) 169 “The principles established in Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 were not applicable to a case in which the former employer of a patent attorney now employed within a competitor organisation sought injunctive relief to restrain the current employer from acting by, or otherwise seeking assistance or advice from, the patent attorney in… [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:31 pm by Barry Sookman
…The post Copyright does not protect content produced by Generative AI (GenAI): Thaler v Perlmutter appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in People v LaVilla (4th Dept 8/30/11) has again held that an exception to the general rule that cannot be appealed as of right is when the restitution hearing was bifurcated from sentencing:“[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not appeal as of right from a restitution order in a criminal case . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am by Laura Coogan, Olswang LLP
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:01 am by Tucker Chambers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a significant opinion on the topic of genericness, Elliott v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
309/08, G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW Holdings Ltd. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in People v LaVilla (4th Dept 8/30/11) has again held that an exception to the general rule that cannot be appealed as of right is when the restitution hearing was bifurcated from sentencing:“[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not appeal as of right from a restitution order in a criminal case . . . [read post]