Search for: "Gent v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
  It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This Fifth Circuit ruling is remarkable, not so much for its holding that a Texas man had a qualified right to confront witnesses against him in a hearing to revoke his supervised release, but for Judge Ho's concurring opinion, which is basically an amicus brief addressed to the Supreme Court's pending ruling in the Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
              So too, the lawyersof the late medieval ius commune in the 12th to 15th centuries, both before and after the advent of civic republicanism as usually defined, engaged in endless debates over the legal relationships among empire, monarchies like that of France, and the paradigmatic republican city-states of Italy and elsewhere. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:00 pm by Giles Peaker
A possession claim (Axnoller v Brake) and an eviction claim (Brake v Axnoller). [read post]
16 May 2021, 6:25 pm
It was with this in mind that one might usefully approach the recognition, publicly (and at last) of the massacre of a large portion of the Chinese population of Torreón, in the Mexican state of Coahuila, to be acknowledged by Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador who will ask forgiveness of the Chinese community  on behalf of the state. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is according to the test laid down by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Ivey v Genting Casinos. [read post]
 On 30 April 2020, the Court of Appeal handed down a judgment confirming that the test for dishonesty in criminal law is that set out by the Supreme Court in Ivey v Genting Casinos, as opposed to the much criticised Ghosh test. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    [1] Gent v Strone [2] Ironically the plaintiff could have demanded full payment of his statutory entitlement which he did not do. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    [1] Gent v Strone [2] Ironically the plaintiff could have demanded full payment of his statutory entitlement which he did not do. [read post]