Search for: "Geoghegan v. Geoghegan" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
In Meegan v Times Newspapers Ltd[2016] IECA 327 (09 November 2016) Hogan J for the Court of Appeal (Finlay Geoghegan and Peart JJ concurring) explained that the section is clearly designed to provide a defence for publishers who show that they acted bona fide and that the publication was fair and reasonable having regard, in particular, to the matters set out in section 26(2) of the 2009 Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
This is the case for law-making pursuant to Article I, Section 7, for admitting new states to the union pursuant to Article IV, Section 3, and even for calling a new constitutional convention pursuant to Article V. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:19 am by Mairead Enright
Justice Hugh Geoghegan, who has retired. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Julie Lam
  In lieu of granting leave to appeal in Geoghegan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
Damages of up to 10 million euros were sought for infringing Danone's word trade mark ESSENSIS.The High Court (Mrs Justice Finlay Geoghegan) gave its ruling today and it's not what Danone expected. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
6 May 2018, 3:16 pm by Giles Peaker
On airbnb/short let use, HHJ Jan Luba QC dismissed an appeal against the decision in Bermondsey Exchange Freeholders Limited v Kevin Geoghegan Conway, upholding the District Judge’s findings that short let use was in breach of lease clauses stating: Not to use or permit the use of the Demised Premises or any part thereof otherwise than as a residential flat with the occupation of one family only. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:00 pm by Giles Peaker
Bermondsey Exchange Freeholders Limited v Kevin Geoghegan Conway. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
Justice Finlay-Geoghegan –  that the government has failed to give effect to that Article of the c [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:43 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
One of the strongest aspects of this litigation is that it has a case right on point: Clinton v New York (1998), which held the line-item veto unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:24 am by Liz Campbell
Geoghegan J upheld the constitutionality of this part in Enright v Ireland and the Attorney General on the basis that the registration requirement does not constitute a penalty, and is a proportionate measure to protect the rights of other citizens. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:02 pm
Posted online only yesterday was the decision of the Irish Supreme Court (Hardiman J, Fennelly J and, giving judgment for the court, Macken J) of 19 May 2010 in Compagnie Gervais Danone v Glanbia Foods Society Ltd [2010] IESC 36 (thank you, Gemma O'Farrell, for the tip-off).This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court (Finlay Geoghegan, J.) which was delivered over three years ago, on 20 April 2007. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:56 am
Geoghegan J upheld the constitutionality of this part in Enright v Ireland and the Attorney General on the basis that the registration requirement does not constitute a penalty, and is a proportionate measure to protect the rights of other citizens. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In McCann v JM [2015] IECA 281 (8 December 2015) [38], Hogan J (Ryan P and Finlay Geoghegan J concurring) in the Court of Appeal referred uncritically to Collins. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:23 am
Lefty labor lawyer Thomas Geoghegan wrote about it in his most recent book, as I discuss in my my law review article analyzing his book. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
Citing Sisojeva v Latvia (Eur. [read post]