Search for: "Georgia v. Coleman" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
Chatman, 13-8725, which asked whether Georgia’s Supreme Court improperly revisited the performance prong of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Coleman, 2013 WL 6050665 (Georgia Supreme Court 2013). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Friedman
The discovery requests granted were ones relating to past 1st Amendment violations by defendant prison authorities.In Coleman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm by Rick Hasen
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm by Michelle Yeary
Coleman, 113 F.3d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir. 1997). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm by Bill Araiza
Lane, an abandonment he repeated a couple of months ago in Coleman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:26 am by Tony Mauro
" Also winning in the category of judicial opinions is the late 7th Circuit judge Terence Evans, who amusingly dealt with the weighty trademark issues surrounding the quilted pattern of certain toilet paper brands in Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am by Steve Hall
In our opinion, this decision in Coleman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
The 16-unit Coleman Hill complex, which caters to law students, sits just across Georgia Avenue from the law school.McDaniel’s absence from class struck Whitmire as suspicious:“There were some friends that were supposed to have been out searching [for Lauren Giddings] the night before. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Fla. 1995) (same).GeorgiaThe Georgia consumer protection provides only for injunctive relief, Ga. [read post]